姓名:Garret | | 188.143.232.** | 時間:2015/8/16 上午 03:57:42 | | ☆☆☆☆☆ | Is it convenient to talk at the moment? <a href=" http://www.medasil.com/paravol-palo-alto-labs.pdf ">paravol palo alto labs</a> The District Court agreed with the brothers, and the government appealed the case to the Court of Appeals for the Third District. On Tuesday, a three-judge panel upheld the lower court's ruling, finding that the actions of the police were "highly disconcerting" under a physical intrusion theory of the Fourth Amendment. The judges dismissed the government's arguments that the search was legal because the police had probable cause even if they didn't seek a warrant, saying "generally speaking, a warrantless search is ***t??rendered reasonable merely because probable cause existed??that would have justified the issuance of a warrant."
| |