| 姓名：Richie |  | 188.143.232.** | | 時間：2015/8/15 下午 12:18:54 | | ☆☆☆☆☆ | | I'd like to withdraw $100, please <a href=" http://www.varosvillage.com/alpha-male-xl-before-and-after.pdf ">alpha male xl directions</a> Excitable coverage was given last week to new draft guidelines issued by Sir James Munby, the judge in charge of our family courts, which it was claimed would be a groundbreaking move towards lifting the blanket of secrecy that has allowed our “child protection” system to become such a national scandal. The welcome given to Lord Justice Munby’s draft guidelines to answer “the charge that we have a system of secret and unaccountable justice” – entitled “Transparency in the Family Courts (and Court of Protection)” – came from two opposing directions. On one side, two newspapers proclaimed it as a victory for their own campaigns to open up our family courts to greater public scrutiny. On the other was one of the chief cheerleaders for the system, Sir Martin Narey, ***w Michael Gove’s chief adviser on childcare, who wrote an article for The Times, “Family courts don’t take e***ugh children into care”. The new “transparency”, he argued, would enable the public to see how desperately needed is the vital work our courts and social workers are doing.
| |