| 姓名：Willard |  | 188.143.232.** | | 時間：2015/5/11 下午 07:22:09 | | ☆☆☆☆☆ | | Where's the nearest cash machine? http://www.khsauter.de/index.php/cipla-silagra-review.pdf silagra india The fundamentals of Islam are in property acquisition. It’s all about jihad/war,more for the winning of more and more property (which includes human property, especially the women as “wives”) than any form of spiritual enlightenment. But the one thing most of the west fails to understand about Islamic teaching is the practice – and encouragement to practice – “taqqiyeh”, which is “deceit.” Islam openly advocates using taqqiyeh, k***wing how liberal western thinking, with especially Christian belief in universal love and tolerance, gulps it all up with astonishing naivety. It’s all about things like: We’re “refugees” but actually we’re here to multiply and slowly build the strength to take Europe as part of the caliphate. Taqqiyeh is key because our own mentality can’t grasp the meaning of universal deceit just as Muslims don’t get our education girls. Of course there are very nice Muslims, those we see as “moderate”. Does it strike ***body that these “moderates” are for the most part extremely reluctant to condemn any of the atrocities (or what the west perceives as atrocities, for the Koran’s idea of a fun day out is beheading, beheading and more beheading). Moderates are themselves targets, for if there are *** infidel heads to lop off, any other will do. All very well those saying it’s the west’s fault for ***t doing anything for these poor people. They see this very attitude as western weakness to be exploited even more. Sooner you get the idea of taqqiyeh, the sooner you will see that Islam LIKES being in an oppressive environment. After all, most of it didn’t need exploitative westerners for that; they do such a fine job of it in every single Muslim country in existence. Of course it’s sad for those of us brought up to be open-minded, to feel for the underdog. All misplaced when it comes to understanding a mentality so fundamentally at odds with that concept.
| |